A | DECATUR, Ga. -- A suburban Atlanta woman has been sentenced to 30 years in prison for the 2021 murder of a 4-month-old who died after she placed him to sleep on his abdomen in the child care center she operated out of her basement.A judge sentenced Amanda Hickey, 48, on Friday after families of children she was accused of abusing gave emotional testimony against her.”I know that there is nothing I can say in words to take away their pain, except take responsibility and express extreme sorrow for what I’ve done,” Hickey told DeKalb County Superior Court Chief Judge LaTisha Dear Jackson, according to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. “This is my legacy now.”Charlie Cronmiller was being cared for in Hickey's Little Lovey child care center when he died on Feb. 3, 2021. Hickey didn't check on him for more than two hours before finding him covered in vomit and not breathing. The infant was pronounced dead at a hospital.Hickey operated the child care center from the basement of her Dunwoody home. She initially told investigators that she put the baby down on his back, in line with state regulations, but that the child rolled over onto his abdomen. Security video, however, showed Hickey actually placed the infant facedown.Video showed her swinging other babies by their feet, slamming them into the ground, pulling their hair, pushing and tripping toddlers, and placing others in unsafe positions for sleep, prosecutors said. The victims ranged in age from 6 to 18 months.Hickey was licensed to care for six children, but prosecutors said 10 were inside her home the day Charlie died.She pleaded guilty Sept. 22 to seven counts of first-degree child cruelty, seven counts of reckless conduct, one count of second-degree child cruelty and three counts of battery. Hickey entered an Alford plea, which allows a person to maintain her innocence while acknowledging that it is in her best interest to plead guilty to charges of second-degree murder and second-degree child cruelty related to Cronmiller's death. “There is no remorse,” the baby's mother, Stephanie Cronmiller, told the court Friday. “The only thing she’s sorry about is that she got caught. I focus on forgiving myself because I chose her. How could I not think this was my fault?”Hickey was taken into custody immediately after the hearing. Jackson ordered that once Hickey is released from prison, she can’t have contact with the victims or any children younger than 13, and can’t gain financially from the case.。 是否有很多球迷现在心里都有一种很强烈的感慨，曾经大家最大的愿望，是期待中国足球有一天能够追上乒乓球的高度，可现实发展却走向了另外一个方向。不是足球变强追上乒乓，反倒是不少传统优势项目，身上慢慢出现很多过去只有足球身上才看得见的问题，于是网络上才有了那句很扎心的调侃，各个项目仿佛都在慢慢向足球看齐。
B | 这种观感并不是说国乒已经沦落到国足的成绩，而是商业化浪潮席卷整个中国体坛之后，很多底层矛盾开始在不同项目身上轮番显现出来。 放在二三十年前，各个项目的边界其实分得十分清晰。足球率先开启职业化，拥抱市场资本，早早就面对票房、赞助、资本逐利带来的种种乱象，而乒乓球、跳水这类优势项目，更多依靠举国体制的闭环保护，基层体校层层选材，把竞技成绩放在第一位，商业只是锦上添花的补充。那时候二者仿佛活在两套完全不同的体系里，一个直面市场的汹涌冲击，一个躲在体制保护壳里安稳拿成绩，彼此的问题很难互相传染。
C | 但时代变化之后，没有哪个项目可以完全隔绝商业化。整个体育行业都要走向市场化，要开发赛事IP，要争取商业赞助，要做流量传播，运动员的个人商业价值也被充分释放。
D | 商业化本身并不是坏事，它可以给运动员带来更高收入，扩大项目社会影响力，让体育产业赚到更多钱。可问题在于，当商业诉求和竞技成绩发生冲突的时候，很多项目都遭遇到和足球曾经一模一样的难题，如何平衡流量、资本和纯粹竞技，这件事并没有现成的标准答案。 足球最早把这套矛盾暴露得淋漓尽致。金元时代资本大量涌入联赛，俱乐部资金充足，球员薪资水涨船高，联赛看上去热热闹闹，可资本更多涌向一线赛场，追求短期票房和成绩，成本高昂的青训却被持续忽视。青少年踢球门槛越来越高，普通家庭孩子很难走职业道路，人才池子不断萎缩。联赛追求观赏性、商业热度，国家队却要成绩，两套目标互相拉扯，最后联赛热闹，国家队的根基却一点点被掏空，再叠加管理层面的漏洞，最终酿成长久的低谷。
E | 过往大家以为，这只是足球独有的病症，小球项目不会重蹈覆辙。 现实却是，这套矛盾正在慢慢传导到其他传统优势项目身上。就拿乒乓球来说，过去国乒长盛不衰，依靠的是完善的地方队、二队一队升降级、残酷的队内竞争，源源不断挖掘新人。而商业化改革之后，赛事体系要兼顾商业曝光，赛程排布要照顾赞助商需求，大量的商业活动、密集的国际赛事挤占封闭集训、队内打磨新人的时间。直通选拔这类原本用来挑选人才的比赛，慢慢带上商业表演的色彩。地方队伍也开始更看重短期比赛成绩，不愿意花费数年时间去打磨暂时出不了成绩的年轻苗子，基层教练流失，愿意埋头苦训的青少年不断变少，人才储备的根基开始松动，只是因为过去几十年家底足够厚，危机只是潜伏，还没有彻底爆发出来。 这也是球迷心里最难受的地方，足球是家底薄，在市场化冲击下直接垮掉；而乒乓球这类项目，是在商业开发的过程中，一点点消耗前辈留下来的人才红利。很多人看到部分现象，才会产生“都向足球靠拢”的感受，本质不是成绩直接拉平，而是遇到了相似的困境：流量优先级提升，青训根基被忽视，短期目标压倒长期建设，竞技之外的利益纠葛变多，原本纯粹的竞技环境被不断干扰。 除此之外，还有一层现实，就是公众人物的双重标准争议。过去体育圈普遍宣扬拼搏、奉献、淡泊名利，这套价值观深入人心。但职业化之后，顶尖运动员、行业管理者可以借助项目的公众影响力获得巨大商业收益。当一边对外强调奉献精神，另一边圈层内部享受商业化带来的丰厚回报，这种反差就很容易刺痛普通观众。
F | 足球过去出现的腐败风波，本质就是权力、公共体育资源和商业利益没有划清清晰的边界，而现在其他项目同样要面对这道考题，如何把公共资源和个人商业收益划分清楚，做到公开透明，接受大众监督，这是所有走向市场化的项目绕不开的一关。 当然我们也要客观分清，观感上趋同，不等于实际水平已经完全一致。乒乓球依旧站在世界顶尖行列，大赛依旧可以拿下大量金牌，和足球全方位的溃败存在本质区别。足球是职业化改革之后，既丢掉了旧体制的优势，又没有建立起健康成熟的职业体系，两头落空。而乒乓球依旧保留着举国体制的强大兜底，只是商业化带来的副作用开始显现出来。 很多人会简单把问题全部归罪于商业化本身，其实商业化本身无罪。放眼全球，NBA、欧洲足球联赛，都是高度商业化，同时还能源源不断产出顶尖人才。真正的问题出在我们的转型过程，制度建设没有跟上市场扩张的速度。资本进来了，流量来了，但是人才选拔、青训建设、利益监管的规则没有同步完善。我们习惯了追求短期亮眼成绩，却很难沉下心做十年二十年的基础建设。不管是足球还是乒乓球，最致命的敌人从来不是市场，而是急功近利，只盯着眼前的热度与结果，忽视底层人才土壤的培育。
G | 往后中国体坛所有项目都避不开这条转型之路。市场会带来资金、曝光、更高的运动员收入，但如果一味追逐流量和商业利益，忽略竞技体育最根本的青训、公平选拔，再辉煌的家底也会慢慢消耗殆尽。足球已经用几十年的教训给全行业敲响警钟，其他优势项目，应当以此为镜，而不是一步步重复走过的老路。
Current article:http://www.liaoenxingunchuanglou.buzz/9ma/rwkk.html
Published on:07:25:41
